Talk:UseOwnName
*cough* As I said there, the original flag info in this article too conveyed more information than is possible with the template.
chpatrick 07:08, 31 May 2005 (CDT)
And what prevented you from expanding the template yourself? And, if there really was something: As you can see, the standard-template can still be used to include most information, rather than doing an all-new header.
Yet, I'll add Usable in: and Applicable to: in a minute, since at least the former is recurring information.
Just to make this clear: I have no problem with suggestions like that. I just don't understand how on one hand, you find the time to create a custom header and two talks how the current template is inadequate, but on the other hand can't be arsed to do the change yourself...
- Renegade 08:13, 31 May 2005 (CDT)
Sorry Renegade, I created this article. Browser keeps logging me out... Sorry about not following header template - I didn't know there was one, nor how I would have gone about editing it!
See ModEnc:Templates ;)
Yet, this still doesn't explain why chpatrick didn't just do it himself :P
- Renegade 00:14, 1 Jun 2005 (CDT)