ModEnc is currently in Maintenance Mode: Changes could occur at any given moment, without advance warning.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:TechnoTypes"
From ModEnc
(Re:) |
(→Slaved and Enslaves: new section) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
''-pd'' | ''-pd'' | ||
:It looks much better here because you don't have vector<VoxelAnimation> and similar beasts in Value Type. But upon expanding the table to 100% and adding linebreaks in the middle, the links do fit in. Thanks for the suggestion. ''//[[User:DCoder|DCoder]] 11:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)'' | :It looks much better here because you don't have vector<VoxelAnimation> and similar beasts in Value Type. But upon expanding the table to 100% and adding linebreaks in the middle, the links do fit in. Thanks for the suggestion. ''//[[User:DCoder|DCoder]] 11:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Slaved and Enslaves == | ||
| + | |||
| + | These are both in the Applicable Tags sections of [[TechnoTypes]] '''and''' [[InfantryTypes]]. That wasn't intentional, was it? —[[User:Vinifera7|Vinifera7]] 15:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:38, 16 May 2008
I would suggest making the pointers this way:
| INI File | Section | Key | Value Type | Default Value | Adds to list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rules(md).ini | Object's ID | Template:TTL | float | [General]→Template:TTL | |
| Rules(md).ini | Object's ID | Template:TTL | float | [General]→Template:TTL | |
| Rules(md).ini | Object's ID | Template:TTL | float | [General]→Template:TTL | |
| Rules(md).ini | Object's ID | Template:TTL | float | [General]→Template:TTL | |
| Rules(md).ini | Object's ID | Template:TTL | float | [General]→Template:TTL |
It works fine in tables.
-pd
- It looks much better here because you don't have vector<VoxelAnimation> and similar beasts in Value Type. But upon expanding the table to 100% and adding linebreaks in the middle, the links do fit in. Thanks for the suggestion. //DCoder 11:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Slaved and Enslaves
These are both in the Applicable Tags sections of TechnoTypes and InfantryTypes. That wasn't intentional, was it? —Vinifera7 15:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
