ModEnc is currently in Maintenance Mode: Changes could occur at any given moment, without advance warning.
Difference between revisions of "Trainable"
From ModEnc
m (No BuildingType has Trainable=no yet they still aren't promoted. Other Types if they don't have Trainable=no are promoted.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|files={{Categ|Rules(md).ini}} | |files={{Categ|Rules(md).ini}} | ||
|values=boolean | |values=boolean | ||
| − | |default=yes | + | |default=yes for {{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}; no for {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} |
|types={{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} | |types={{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} | ||
|ts=yes | |ts=yes | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted. | Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted. | ||
| − | It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes', not 'no'. | + | It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes' for {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, not 'no'. |
Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag. | Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag. | ||
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure. | It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:11, 24 December 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flag: | Trainable |
| File(s): | Rules(md).ini |
| Values: | boolean |
| Default: | yes for InfantryTypes, VehicleTypes, AircraftTypes; no for BuildingTypes |
| Applicable to: | InfantryTypes, VehicleTypes, AircraftTypes, BuildingTypes |
Specifies whether this object is subject to the Veterancy System and can thus be promoted.
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy crate bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have Trainable=no even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes' for VehicleTypes, not 'no'. Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.
